Functional-purpose compound feed for sturgeon and salmon fish containing humic substances
https://doi.org/10.29235/1817-7204-2026-64-2-141-152
Abstract
This article analyzes the development of the functional feed category in modern aquaculture. Based on a study of the specific effects of bioactive additives on fish, the concept is explored and the relevance of its implementation in the cultivation of valuable fish species (sturgeon and salmon) is substantiated. It is established that the use of biologically active additives allows for the transformation of traditional feeds into functional ones, imparting therapeutic and prophylactic properties that go beyond standard nutritional indicators. The results of the development of formulations enriched with biologically active humic substances by the Fish Industry Institute, a state-owned enterprise, are presented. The mechanism of the complex action of these components is revealed, and it is proven that the use of the developed functional feeds promotes the restoration of the morphofunctional state of the liver after feeding high-energy diets, normalizes metabolism, and increases resistance to stress factors. Improved fish farming performance (increased survival, increased average daily weight gain, and a decrease in the feed conversion factor) has been experimentally confirmed. The obtained results substantiate the economic efficiency of using functional additives in intensive fish farming and confirm the high significance of developments for import substitution in the high-tech feed segment.
Keywords
About the Authors
Zh. V. KoshakBelarus
Zhanna V. Koshak – Ph. D. (Engineering), Associate Professor, Head of the Laboratory of Mixfeed
22, Stebeneva St., 220024, Minsk
S. M. Degtyarik
Belarus
Sviatlana M. Degtyarik – Ph. D. (Biology), Associate Professor, Head of the Laboratory of Fish Diseases
22, Stebeneva St., 220024, Minsk
D. N. Denisov
Russian Federation
Danil N. Denisov – General Director
30a, 2nd Privok- zalnaya St., 249340, Zhizdra, Kaluga Region
References
1. Sevastyanova T. V., Usha B. V. Functional feed additives for farm animals and their impact on productivity indicators. Agrarnaya nauka = Agrarian Science, 2021, no. 347 (4), pp. 99–103 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2021347-4-99-103
2. Shcherbina M. A., Gamygin E. A. Fish feeding in freshwater aquaculture. Moscow, Publishing house of Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography, 2006. 360 p. (in Russian).
3. Ostroumova I. N. Biological foundations of fish feeding. St. Petersburg, 2001. 372 p. (in Russian).
4. Sergeeva N. T. Features of lipid nutrition of rainbow trout. Fiziologo-biokhimicheskie osnovy kormleniya ryb v akvakul’ture: sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Physiological and biochemical foundations of fish feeding in aquaculture: collection of scientific papers]. Kaliningrad, 1995, pp. 4–16 (in Russian).
5. Tyutyunnikov B. N. Chemistry of fats. 2nd ed. Moscow, Pishchevaya promyshlennost’ Publ., 1974. 448 p. (in Russian).
6. Vladovskaya S. Necessary additives to feed and fish needs for them. Rybnoe khozyaistvo. Seriya: Korma i kormlenie v akvakul’ture [Fish Industry. Series: Feed and Feeding in Aquaculture]. Moscow, 2001, iss. 1, pp. 27–32 (in Russian).
7. Abramova Zh. I., Kartavtseva N. E., Nikolaeva L. A. Study of lipid oxidation processes in artificial fish feeds and comparative evaluation of methods for their determination. Aktual’nye problemy kormleniya ryb v industrial’nom rybovodstve: sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Actual problems of fish feeding in industrial fish farming: collection of scientific papers]. Leningrad, 1981, iss. 176, pp. 103–116 (in Russian).
8. Holman R. T., Lundberg W. O., Malkin T. (eds.). Progress in chemistry of fats and other lipids. Vol. 2. London, Pergamon Press; New York, Academic Press, 1954. 347 p.
9. Dziahtsiaryk S., Martsul O. Diseases are “pitfalls” of fish farming. Nauka i innovatsii = Science and Innovation, 2020, no. 3 (205), pp. 24–28 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.29235/1818-9857-2020-3-24-28
10. Korsakov K. V. World experience of humic acids using in poultry farming. Osnovy i perspektivy organicheskikh biotekhnologii = Fundamentals and Perspectives of Organic Biotechnologies, 2018, no. 3, pp. 3–4 (in Russian).
11. Bezuglova O. S., Zinchenko V. E. Application of humic substances in animal husbandry (review). Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK = Achievements of Science and Technology in Agro-Industrial Complex, 2016, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 89–93 (in Russian).
12. Lyubimova N. A., Rabinovich G. Yu. Humic substances as components of feed additives (review). Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK = Achievements of Science and Technology in the Agro-Industrial Complex, 2020, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 77–84 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.24411/0235-2451-2020-10914
13. Kvetkovskaya A. V., Zayats V. N., Golushko O. G., Nadarinskaya M. A., Makarova N. L., Ovtchinnikova T. F., Zhmakova N. A. Usage of supplements of natural origin in dry-grass period for cows. Zootekhnicheskaya nauka Belarusi: sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Zootechnical science of Belarus: a collection of scientific papers]. Zhodino, 2008, vol. 43, pt. 2, pp. 99–110 (in Russian).
14. Korovushkin A. A., Nefedova S. A., Yakunin Y. V., Baryshev R. V. Efficiency of use of non-modified microporous humic acids from leonardite in the diet of carp. Vestnik Ryazanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrotekhnologicheskogo universiteta imeni P. A. Kostycheva = Herald of Ryazan State Agrotechnological University named after P. A. Kostychev, 2019, no. 3 (43), pp. 59–63 (in Russian).
15. Koshak J. V., Gadlevskaya N. N., Rusina A. N., Zenovich N. V., Rybkina E. E., Kohovich A. G. Humic preparations in the composition of therapeutic and prophylactic feeds for sturgeon fish. Voprosy rybnogo khozyaistva Belarusi: sbornik nauchnykh trudov = Belarus fish industry problems: collected transactions. Minsk, 2021, iss. 37, pp. 341–356 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.47612/978-985-880-000000-0-2022-37-341-356
16. Chukhareva N. V., Shishmina L. V., Novikov A. A. Effect of thermal treatment of peats on composition and properties of humic acids. Solid Fuel Chemistry, 2003, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 36–42.
17. Balla D., Dietrich O., Quast J. Solute retention in groundwater table controlled fen area with respect to various land use scenarios. International Peat Journal, 2000, no. 10, pp. 33–47.
18. Kasimova L. V., Zhilyakova T. P., Titova E. V., Panov A. N., Udintsev S. N., Sibagatov V. A., Belousov N. M. Prospects for the use of peat and its processing products in animal husbandry. Tomsk, Publishing House of Tomsk Polytechnic University, 2006. 92 p. (in Russian).
19. Griban V. G. Dealing with the mechanism of humic origin preparations cation upon animal organism. Organicheskoe veshchestvo torfa: tezisy dokladov Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma, Minsk, 15–19 maya 1995 g. = Peat organic matter: theses of papers International Symposium, Minsk, May 15–19, 1995. Minsk, 1995, p. 120 (in Russian).
Review
JATS XML




























