Preview

Analysis of the main stages of improvement of technical means for the application of mineral fertilizers

https://doi.org/10.29235/1817-7204-2025-63-1-58-67

Abstract

In the Republic of Belarus, crop yields have increased 3.5–5 times over the past 60 years due to the combined result of work in the field of breeding, mechanization of fertilizers and chemical plant protection products application, which is a significant achievement of science and practice [1, p. 28]. One of the main criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of mineral fertilizers is considered to be the payback of 1 kg of NPK, which should be at least 8 kg of grain or 10–12 feed units by all crops on arable land [2, p. 113; 3]. To achieve such results, spreaders must perform high-quality distribution of mineral fertilizers within the established agrotechnical deadlines. The criterion for assessing the quality of the distribution of mineral fertilizers over the field area is the coefficient of variation, which is defined as the ratio of the standard deviation to the average dose. In addition to uniform distribution over the field area, high-quality incorporation of mineral fertilizers with tillage tools is also essential. As for the timeliness of applying the specified doses of fertilizers within the established agrotechnical deadlines, the most important factors here are the availability of equipment at farms during the busiest period and provision of high-performance fertilizer spreaders. It should be considered, that agricultural chemicalization machines are used from early spring to late autumn, and their annual load exceeds the same indicator for other agricultural machinery. In addition, the operation of fertilizer spreaders involves interaction with aggressive media, which imposes appropriate requirements to ensure their reliability. It should be noted that currently unmanned aerial vehicles are beginning to be actively used to introduce chemicals [4, p. 2]; publications on the development and testing of nanofertilizers are increasingly appearing in the scientific literature [5, p. 319]. In this regard, in order to determine further trends in the improvement of technical means for fertilization, it is necessary to analyze the main stages of the development of these technical means and identify the distinctive stages of their improvement.

About the Authors

V. V. Azarenko
Academic Secretary of the Department of Agrarian Sciences of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus

Vladimir V. Azarenko – Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Dr. Sc. (Engineering), Associate Professor

66, Nezavisimosti Ave., 220072, Minsk



A. A. Zheshka
Scientific and Practical Center of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus for Agriculture Mechanization
Belarus

Aliaxandr A. Zheshka – Ph. D. (Engineering), Associate Professor, Leading Researcher

1, Knorin Str., 220049, Minsk



References

1. Bambalov N. N., Sokolov G. A. New coating of complex granular organomineral improvements of prolonged action. Zemledelie i rastenievodstvo [Сrop Farming and Plant Growing], 2020, no. 4 (131), pp. 28–33 (in Russian).

2. Tsybulka N. N., Evseev E. B., Zhukova I. I. Agronomic and economic efficiency of the application mineral fertilizers for perennial grasses on peat-gley soil. Pochvovedenie i agrokhimiya [Soil Science and Agrochemistry], 2021, no. 1 (66), pp. 113–119 (in Russian).

3. Stepuk L. Ya. Proof of the need for development and implementation of state-of-the-art scientific and technical program. Nauchno-tekhnicheskii progress v sel’skokhozyaistvennom proizvodstve: materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-tekhnicheskoi konferentsii, Minsk, 20–21 oktyabrya 2022 g. [Scientific and technological progress in agricultural production: proceedings of the International scientific and technical conference, Minsk, October 20–21, 2022]. Minsk, 2022, pp. 27–33 (in Russian).

4. Song С., Liu L., Wang G., Han J., Zhang T., Lan Y. Particle deposition distribution of multi-rotor UAV-based fertilizer spreader under different height and speed parameters. Drones, 2023, vol. 7, no. 7, art. 425. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7070425

5. Rai V., Acharya S., Dey N. Implications of nanobiosensors in agriculture. Journal of Biomaterials and Nanobiotechnology, 2012, no. 3, pp. 315–324. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbnb.2012.322039

6. Siunder I. J. Improvement in guano-spreaders. Patent US 31409, 1861.

7. Wiltsie J. M. Apparatus for distributing fertilizers. Patent US 46515, 1865.

8. Fries H. E. Hand planter and distributer. Patent US 337390, 1886.

9. Burnett W. G. Improvement in lime-spreader. Patent US 104694, 1870.

10. Barrick C. W. Improvement in combined corn-planters and fertilizer-distributers. Patent US 117369, 1871.

11. Crane T. R. Grain-drill tube. Patent US 372126, 1887.

12. Muller G. Distributer for flock, sand, tinsel, & c. Patent US 425338, 1890.

13. Synck H. Fertilizer distributor. Patent CA 157303, 1914. Available at: https://www.ic.gc.ca/opic-cipo/cpd/eng/patent/157303/summary.html?type=number_search&tabs1Index=tabs1_1 (accessed 10.09.2024).

14. Russell C. New or improved agricultural distributing machine or spreader. Patent GB 577501, 1946. Available at: https://patents.google.com/patent/GB577501A (accessed 10.09.2024).

15. Swanson D. Greenness phenology metrics. Monitoring of greenness and snow phenology by remote automated cameras in the NPS Arctic inventory and monitoring network, 2013-14. Fort Collins, 2015, pp. 4–6.

16. Yashin S. N., Tikhonov S. V. Application of S-shape logistic curves when assessing and forecasting the innovation potential of the enterprise. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit, 2015, no. 43 (667), pp. 37–50 (in Russian).

17. Chapman S. J. The while loop. MATLAB programming for engineers. 6th ed. Boston, 2020, pp. 207–213.

18. Koning C. J. de. Spreader. Patent US 3777992, 1973.

19. Riley J. R. Material spreader system with hydraulic drive and speed control means. Patent US 3776431, 1973.

20. Palmer H. S. Method and apparatus for spreading a fertilizing material. Patent US 3780955, 1973.

21. Butenko N. T., Golub V. I., Gordienko S. M., Grabovskii G. G., Gribnik N. D., Evtukha A. A., Kaplunov M. M., Minin S. G., Fedotov N. M., Chumachenko B. A. Mineral fertilizer spreader. Patent SU 372964, 1973. (in Russian).

22. Dougherty E. J. Agricultural implement. Patent US 1292391, 1919.

23. Nirider F. A. Fertilizer distributing machine. Patent CA 212857, 1921. Available at: https://www.ic.gc.ca/opic-cipo/cpd/eng/patent/212857/summary.html?type=number_search&tabs1Index=tabs1_1 (accessed 10.09.2024).

24. Murray H. J. Agricultural precision device. Patent US 1486355, 1924 p.

25. Dake M. L. Spreader. Patent US 2296909, 1942.

26. Kuz’min V. M. Adaptation to seeders for sowing mineral fertilizers. Patent SU 95283, 1952. (in Russian).

27. Pierce B. E. Fertilizer distributor. Patent US 2657831, 1953.

28. Durand E. M. Fertilizer spreader. Patent US 2673741, 1954.

29. Zdenek F., Brandt R. G. Fertilizer feeding and metering mechanism. Patent US 3180525, 1965.

30. Walter S. Broadcast seeder. Patent US 2676695, 1954.

31. Hipwell G. A. Improvements in apparatus for spreading seed, fertilizer and like. Patent GB 722564, 1952. Available at: https://patents.google.com/patent/GB722564A/en?oq=Patent+GB+722564+A (accessed 10.09.2024).


Review

Views: 308


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1817-7204 (Print)
ISSN 1817-7239 (Online)