Dynamics of the growth of exterior and interior indicators in ontogenesis in chickens of gene pool populations and broilers

Conformities of intensity of growth of muscles and bones of the skeleton in relation to the growth of body weight in chickens of the combined type of productivity and broilers have been studied. The research subject were chickens of meat and egg populations: experimental golden-striped (GS), Pushkinskaya from the bioresource collection of Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding and broilers of the Ross 308 cross. The absolute values of body weight, muscle mass, length and thickness of skeletal bones in different age periods were calculated. Studies have shown that the mass of the pectoral and leg muscles has the highest growth rate in all the studied groups. The growth rate of the exterior and interior indicators decreases unevenly with age, especially in broiler chickens. The intensity of the growth of muscles and bones of the skeleton relative to the growth of body weight has been studied using an allometric equation. Studies have shown that the growth of the pectoral and leg muscles in all groups of chickens in the period up to 10 weeks of life outstrips the growth of the body as a whole. The growth of skeletal bones is characterized by negative allometry. Knowledge of the patterns of growth and development of the bird organism and its individual parts allows to adjust the feeding diet depending on the growth period, monitor the correctness of development and deviations from the standard, as well as choose the most informative periods for the selection of breeding birds. 

1. Shahin K. A. Sources of shared variability of the carcass and non-carcass components in Pekin ducklings. Annales de Zootechnie, 2000, vol. 49, no. 1, rr. 67-72. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2000100

2. Mottet A., Tempio G. Global poultry production: current state and future outlook and challenges. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 2017, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 245-256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933917000071

3. Menknasunov M. P. Dynamics of world production and consumption of poultry meat. Upravlenie riskami v APK = Agricultural Risk Management, 2018, no. 2, pp. 87-94 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.53988/24136573-2018-02-05

4. Nikitina I. A. Influence of directional selection on productive and meat qualities of ducks of the Temp cross. Vestsi Natsyyanal’nai akademii navuk Belarusi. Seryya agrarnykh navuk = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. Agrarian series, 2015, no. 2, pp. 89-94 (in Russian).

5. Tickle P. G., Paxton H., Rankin P. G., Hutchinson J. R., Codd J. R. Anatomical and biomechanical traits of broiler chickens across ontogeny. Part I. Anatomy of the musculoskeletal respiratory apparatus and changes in organ size. PeerJ, 2014, vol. 2, p. e432. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.432

6. Tallentire C. W., Leinonen I., Kyriazakis I. Breeding for efficiency in the broiler chicken: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2016, vol. 36, no. 4, art. 66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0398-2

7. Tickle P. G., Hutchinson J. R., Codd J. R. Energy allocation and behaviour in the growing broiler chicken. Scientific Reports, 2018, vol. 8, no. 1, art. 4562. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22604-2

8. Pulcini D., Meo Zilio D., Cenci F., Castellini C., Guarino Amato M. Differences in tibia shape in organically reared chicken lines measured by means of geometric morphometrics. Animals, 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, art. 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010101

9. Panov V. P., Nikitchenko V. E., Nikitchenko D. V., Amelina A. N. Skeleton growth and musculoskeletal ratio in Cornish chicken. Izvestiya Timiryazevskoi sel’skohozyaistvennoi akademii = Izvestiya of Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, 2017, no. 2, pp. 90-105 (in Russian).

10. Bennett C. E., Thomas R., Williams M., Zalasiewicz J., Edgeworth M., Miller H., Coles B., Foster A., Burton E. J., Marume U. The broiler chicken as a signal of a human reconfigured biosphere. Royal Society Open Science, 2018, vol. 5, no. 12, art. 180325. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180325

11. Paxton H., Tickle P. G., Rankin J. W., Codd J. R., Hutchinson J. R. Anatomical and biomechanical traits of broiler chickens across ontogeny. Part II. Body segment inertial properties and muscle architecture of the pelvic limb. PeerJ, 2014, vol. 2, p. e473. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.473

12. Jones G. P. D. Manipulation of organ growth by early‐life food restriction: Its influence on the development of ascites in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 1995, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669508417759

13. Newman S., Leeson S. Skeletal integrity in layers at the completion of egg production. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 1997, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 265-277. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19970021

14. Rath H. C., Balog J. M., Huff W. E., Huff G. R., Kulkarni G. B., Tierce J. F. Comparative differences in the composition and biomechanical properties of tibiae of seven- and seventy-two-week-old male and female broiler breeder chickens. Poultry Science, 1999, vol. 78, no. 8, pp. 1232-1239. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.8.1232

15. Leterrier C., Nys Y. Composition, cortical structure and mechanical propertyes of chickentibiotarsi: effect of growth rate. British Poultry Science, 1992, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 925-939. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669208417536

16. Zerehdaran S., Vereijken A. L. J., van Arendonk J. A. M., van der Waaij E. H. Estimation of genetic parameters for fat deposition and carcass traits in broilers. Poultry Science, 2004, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 521-525. https://doi.org/10.1093/ ps/83.4.521

17. Samuel D. D., Billard L., Pringle D., Wisker L. Influence of growth on pale muscle in broilers. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2012, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 78-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4544

18. Zhang B., Coon C. The relationship of various tibia bone measurements in hens. Poultry Science, 1997, vol. 76, no. 12, pp. 1698-1701. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.12.1698

19. Caldas J. V., Boonsinchai N., Wang J., England J. A., Coon C. N. The dynamics of body composition and body energy content in broilers. Poultry Science, 2019, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 866-877. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey422

20. Semyonov N. V., Nikitchenko V. E., Nikitchenko D. V. Growth muscel dinamics of chickens of cross “Sheiver 2000”. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Agronomiya i zhivotnovodstvo = RUDN Journal of Agronomy and Animal Industries, 2017, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 157-167 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-797X-2017-12-2-157-167

21. Gao Y., Du Z. Q., Wei W. H., Yu X. J., Deng X. M., Feng C. G., Fei J., Feng J. D., Li N., Hu X. X. Mapping quantitative trait loci regulating chicken body composition traits. Animal Genetics, 2009, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 952-954. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1365-2052.2009.01911.x

22. Dou D., Shen L., Zhou J., Cao Z., Luan P., Li Y., Li H., Zhang H., Xiao F., Guo H. Genome-wide association studies for growth traits in broilers. BMC Genomic Data, 2022, vol. 23, no. 1, art. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-021-01017-7

23. Emrani H., Masoudi A. A., Vaez Torshizi R., Ehsani A. Genome‐wide association study of shank length and diameter at different developmental stages in chicken F2 resource population. Animal Genetics, 2020, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 722-730. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12981

24. Fedorova Z. L. Evaluation of the meat quality of chickens of the egg-meat direction of productivity, for promising use in organic production. Genetika i razvedenie zhivotnykh = Genetics and Breeding of Animals, 2021, no. 4, pp. 42-47 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31043/2410-2733-2021-4-42-47

25. Musa H. H., Chen G. H., Cheng J. H., Shuiep E. S., Bao W. B. Breed and sex effect on meat quality of chicken. International Journal of Poultry Science, 2006, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 566-568. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2006.566.568

26. Castellini C., Dal Bosco A. Animal welfare and poultry meat in alternative production systems (and ethics of poultry meat production). Poultry quality evaluation: quality attributes and consumer values. Oxford, 2017, pp. 335-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/ B978-0-08-100763-1.00014-3

27. Tuchemskiy L. I., Nikitchenko V. E., Emanuylova Zh. V., Amelina A. N. The age dynamics of carcass morphology in plymouth rock female chicks. Ptitsevodstvo [Poultry Farming], 2012, no. 6, pp. 37-39 (in Russian).

28. Panov V. P., Nikitchenko V. E., Nikitchenko D. V., Amelina A. N. Growth and ontogenetic changes of muscles quantitative indicators of Cornish chickens. Izvestiya Timiryazevskoi sel’skohozyaistvennoi akademii = Izvestiya of Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, 2016, no. 2, pp. 45-55 (in Russian).

29. Schmidt-Nielsen K. Scaling: why is animal size so important? New York, Cambridge University Press, 1984. 241 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139167826

30. Zotin A. A. Statistical estimation of allometric coefficient. Izvestiya Akademii nauk. Seriya biologicheskaya [Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences. Biological series], 2000, no. 5, pp. 517-524 (in Russian).