Substantiation of the optimal rate of straw bed in sections with different technological solution

There is no consensus among producers and agricultural practitioners as to which bedding material is the best. The choice is largely influenced by its useful properties, duration of use and high cost. Organic (straw, sawdust, wood shavings, peat, etc.), inorganic (sand) and synthetic (rubber mats; mattresses made of chopped rubber, latex, polyurethane foam lining, waterproof wax coating, etc.) materials are used for bedding. A significant part of agricultural organizations in Belarus uses winter straw. As a bedding material, it has a number of useful properties: low thermal conductivity, high moisture absorption capacity, low cost, and comfort for animals. According to the Republican standards for the technological design of new, reconstruction and technological re-equipment of livestock facilities (RNTD-1-2004), the standards for consumption of straw bedding for cows at loose housing on deep litter is 8 kg, but there are no input standards for sections with other technological solutions. The paper presents the results of studies to determine the optimal rate of straw bedding in sections with different technological solutions. Analysis of ethological reactions of animals, contamination of the skin, presence/absence of injuries on the body, temperature characteristics of the straw bedding in different seasons of the year and the economic efficiency of using different straw bedding rates has been performed. It has been determined that the optimal straw bedding rate for the general section is 4.5 kg/animal per day, for a section with a division into a feeding area and a rest area – 3.0 kg/animal per day. Application of these rates of straw bedding will enable it to be used economically without affecting the productivity and resting comfort of cows. The research results can be used in design and construction of industrial dairy complexes and storages for rough feeds.

1. Schneider R. Liegeboxenumbau fur den Kuhkomfort [Cubicle conversion for cow comfort]. Neue Landwirtschaft, 2006, no. 9, pp. 56-59 (in German).

2. Stekolnikov A.A., Semenov B.S., Veremey E.I., Rukol V.M., Zhurba V.A., Kuznetsova T.S. Some aspects of comfort for dairy cows. Voprosy normativno-pravovogo regulirovanija v veterinarii = Issues of Legal Regulation in Veterinary Medicine, 2015, no. 1, pp. 121-123 (in Russian).

3. Wasilewski J. Usprzetowienie gospodarki nawozami naturalnymi w oborach sciolkowych [Streamlining the management of natural fertilizers in litter barns]. Problemy intensyfikacji produkcji zwierzcej z uwzglednieniem ochrony srodowiska i standardow UE [Problems of animal production intensification taking into account environmental protection and EU standards]. Warszawa, 2005, pt. 1, pp. 177-180 (in Polish).

4. Moskalev A.A., Kirikovich S.A. Performance, hematological values and behavior of replacement heifers depending on norms of bedding implementation. Zootekhnicheskaya nauka Belarusi: sbornik nauchnykh trudov = Zootechnic Science of Belarus: collection of scientific papers. Zhodino, 2010, vol. 45, pt. 1, pp. 235-242 (in Russian).

5. Kebekov M.E., Gogaev O.K., Kairov V.R., Dzeranova A.V., Demurova A.R., Bestaeva R.D. Dependence of cow productivity and reproductive performance on housing conditions. Effektivnoe zhivotnovodstvo [Efficient Animal Husbandry], 2019, no. 1 (149), pp. 33-36 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.24411/9999-007A-2019-10014

6. Zavrazhnov A.I., Khmyrov V.D., Kudenko V.B. Technology for the preparation of organic fertilizer from litter manure in piles. Vestnik Vserossiiskogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo instituta mekhanizatsii zhivotnovodstva [Bulletin of the AllRussian Research Institute of Livestock Mechanization], 2015, no. 4 (20), pp. 95-96 (in Russian).

7. Trofimov А.F., Muzyka A.A., Moskaliov A.A. Features of formation of microclimate in livestock buildings depending on design. Vestsі Natsyyanal’nai akademіі navuk Belarusі. Seryya agrarnykh navuk = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. Agrarian series, 2016, no. 2, pp. 80-86 (in Russian).

8. Lyashenko V.V., Kaeshova I.V., Vorobyeva A.A. The effect of bio-litter on the productive qualities of cows. Surskii vestnik [Sursky Bulletin], 2021, no. 3 (15), pp. 43-48 (in Russian).

9. Trofimov A., Timoshenko V., Muzyka A., Kovalevskii I. Economic efficiency of different rates of straw litter application. Agroekonomika [Agrarian Economics], 2004, no. 8, pp. 49-51 (in Russian).

10. Barth K., Kmur K., Brinkmann J., March S., Volling O., Wieler M., Weiß M., Drerup C., Krömker V. Einstreumanagement in der Ökologischen Milchviehhaltung [Bedding management in organic dairy farming]. Ressortforschung für den Ökologischen Landbau 2010 [Departmental research for organic farming 2010]. Braunschweig, 2011, pp. 41-47 (in German).

11. Hörning B. The assessment of housing conditions of dairy cows in littered loose housing systems using three scoring methods. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section A, Animal Science, 2001, vol. 51, suppl. 30, pp. 42-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/090647001316923045

12. Denk K.H. Mechanisieren des Einstreuens – Uberblick und Stand der Technik [Mechanization of bedding – overview and state of the art]. Gumpensteiner Bautagung 2001 zum Thema Stallbau-Stallklima-Verfahrenstechnik: Bericht, 19. und 20. Juni 2001 an der BAL Gumpenstein [Gumpenstein construction conference 2001 on the subject of stable construction, stable climate, process engineering: Report, June 19th and 20th, 2001 at the BAL Gumpenstein]. Irdning, 2001, pp. 59-62 (in German).

13. Kapuinen P. Deep litter systems for beef cattle housed in uninsulated barns. Part 2: Temperatures and nutrients. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 2001, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.2001.0720

14. Sviridova O. How to choose the best cow bedding? : advice to farmers. Moloko & Korma. Menedzhment [Milk & Feed. Management], 2005, no. 3, pp. 24-27 (in Russian).

15. Muzyka A.A., Golod’ko I.V. Zoohygienic assessment of rubber coatings of cubicles for loose housing of highly productive cows. Ekologiya i zhivotnyi mir = Ecology and Animal World, 2014, no. 2, pp. 67-72 (in Russian).

16. Vokey F.J., Guard C.L., Erb H.N., Galton D.M. Effects of alley and stall surfaces on indices of claw and leg health in dairy cattle housed in a free-stall barn. Journal of Dairy Science, 2001, vol. 84, no. 12, pp. 2686-2699. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(01)74723-6

17. Ruunaniemi J., Hautala M., Ahokas J. Physical properties of synthetic bedding materials for free-stall dairy cow. Agricultural and Food Science, 2005, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 134-142. https://doi.org/10.2137/145960605774826019

18. Pariiev A.О. Changes of technological properties of the straw litter in box. Naukovo-tekhnіchnii byuleten’ Іnstitutu tvarinnitstva NAAN Ukraїni = The Scientific and Technical Bulletin of the Institute of Animal Science NAAS of Ukraine, 2013, no. 109, pt. 2, pp. 95-100 (in Ukrainian).

19. Pariyev A.A., Drobyshev O.A., Korotchenko T.N., Kovyazina M.J. Physical and mechanical properties of straw litter. Naukovo-tekhnіchnii byuleten’ Іnstitutu tvarinnitstva NAAN Ukraїni = The Scientific and Technical Bulletin of the Institute of Animal Science NAAS of Ukraine, 2013, no. 109, pt. 2, pp. 108-112 (in Ukrainian).

20. Pariev A.О., Drobyshev O.O., Korotchenko T.М. Research of cows keeping by the loose – boxed technology. Naukovotekhnіchnii byuleten’ Іnstitutu tvarinnitstva NAAN Ukraїni = The Scientific and Technical Bulletin of the Institute of Animal Science NAAS of Ukraine, 2013, no. 109, pt. 2, pp. 100-104 (in Ukrainian).

21. Moskalev A.A., Balueva N.A., Puchka M.P. Influence of the norms of litter application in loose housing of replacement heifers on their hematological parameters, behavioral reactions and productivity. Uchenye zapiski uchrezhdeniya obrazovaniya «Vitebskaya gosudarstvennaya akademiya veterinarnoi meditsiny» [Scientific notes of the Vitebsk State Academy of Veterinary Medicine], 2009, vol. 45, iss. 2, pt. 2, pp. 152-155 (in Russian).

22. Trofimov A.F., Timoshenko V.N., Popkov N.A., Muzyka A.A., Kovalevskii I.A. Rates of straw bedding application for loose housing of cows. Agrarnaya nauka = Agrarian Science, 2005, no. 9, pp. 21-22 (in Russian).

23. Kurak A.S., Moskalev A.A., Puchka M.P. Influence of technological solutions for keeping replacement heifers on their productivity and hematological parameters. Zootekhnicheskaya nauka Belarusi: sbornik nauchnykh trudov = Zootechnic Science of Belarus: collection of scientific paper. Zhodino, 2011, vol. 46, pt. 2, pp. 284-292 (in Russian).

24. Moskalev A.A., Puchka M.P., Murav’eva M.I. Productivity and hematological indicators of replacement heifers depending on technological solutions for their maintenance. Vestnik Belorusskoi gosudarstvennoi sel’skokhozyaistvennoi akademii = Bulletin of the Belarussian State Agricultural Academy, 2010, no. 4, pp. 112-116 (in Russian).

25. Effect of barn airspace temperature on composition and technological parameters of bulk milk produced by dairy cows of Czech Fleckvieh and Holstein breed / O. Polak [et al.] // Acta Univ. Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 2011, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 271-279. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201159060271

26. Polak O., Falta D., Hanus O., Chladek G. Effect of barn airspace temperature on composition and technological parameters of bulk milk produced by dairy cows of Czech Fleckvieh and Holstein breeds. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensi, 2011, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 271-279. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201159060271