Influence of agro-landscape on the ecological sustainability of cover oats and perennial herbs phytocenoes

Biodiversity is the cornerstone of modern agro-phytocinology. Based on its records, the ecological sustainability of agricultural landscapes is predicted. The aim of the research was to study the influence of soils and the topography of the terminal moraine hill, as well as the age of phytocenoses, on the value of the coefficient of floristic similarity of oat communities with over-sowing of grasses (2019) and clover-and-timothy herbage of 1 year of use (2020). Monitoring of the botanical composition of phytocenoses was carried out on a transect – a field crossing slopes of different exposures and soils of varying degrees of swampiness, located at the agroecological station All-Russian Research Institute of Reclaimed Lands (VNIIMZ; Tver region, Russia). The standing density of oats, red clover, timothy grass, weed species, as well as other environmental parameters were taken into account on 30 systematically located land plots. It is shown that only a few plant species affect the Jaccard coefficient. The topography and soil features of the agricultural landscape, as well as the age of the plant community, have a significant impact on the stability and productivity of the agrocenosis. The main factor affecting the variability of the floristic similarity indicator is soil hydromorphism. An increase in the index of the floristic similarity coefficient is observed on all soils and slopes as the herbage matures. Productivity of grasses depends to the greatest extent on the nature of the interaction of the relief and soils – on the southern slope of the hill, a low hay yield was noted (on average, 5.34 t/ha), the minimum of which was observed on highly swampy soils (4.92 t/ha), on the northern slope, the yield of hay was higher (on average 6.57 t/ha), the minimum of which was noted on moderately swampy soils (6.26 t/ha). Based on the revealed patterns, it is possible to develop measures to adapt technologies for growing perennial grasses to the natural conditions of farms in the mode of adaptive landscape fodder production.

1. McGill B.J. Towards a unification of unified theories of biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 2010, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 627-642. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01449.x

2. Ebert A.W., Engels, J.M. M. Plant biodiversity and genetic resources matter! Plants, 2020, vol. 9, no. 12, art. 1706. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9121706

3. Shanafelt D.W. Clobert J., Fenichel E.P., Hochberg M.E., Kinzig A., Loreau M., Marquet P.A., Perrings C. Species dispersal and biodiversity in human-dominated metacommuni-ties. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2018, vol. 457, pp. 199-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.08.041

4. Mirkin B.M. Which plant communities do exist? Journal of Vegetation Science, 1994, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 283-284. https:// https://doi.org/doi.org/10.2307/3236163

5. Mirkin B.M., Rozenberg G. S. Phytocenology: principles and methods. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1978. 211 r. (in Russian).

6. Sapegin L.M., Daineko N.M. The structure and functioning of meadow ecosystems: (environmental monitoring). Gomel, Gomel State University, 2002. 201 p. (in Russian).

7. Kozlov L.G. Mikhkiev A.I., Sin’kevich E.I. Meadow agrocenoses on reclaimed lands. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1982. 180 p. (in Russian).

8. Ivanova N.N., Kapsamun A.D., Ambrosimova N.N. Forage and environment-forming potential of pasture grasses on the drainage land of the Central Non-Chernozem region. Kormoproizvodstvo = Fodder Production, 2019, no. 4, pp. 14-17 (in Russian).

9. Wang S., Fu B.J., Gao G.Y., Zhou J. The hydrological responses of different land cover types in a re-vegetation catchment area of the Loess Plateau, China Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 2012, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 5809-5835. https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-9-5809-2012

10. Kiryushin V.I. Concept for the development of agriculture in the Non-Black Soil Region. St. Petersburg, Kvadro Publ., 2020. 375 p. (in Russian).

11. Ivanov D.A. Landscape-adaptive farming systems: (agroecological aspects). Tver, ChuDo Publ., 2001. 305 p. (in Russian).

12. Ivanov D.A., Kovalev N. G. Landscape and reclamation farming systems: (applied agrogeography). Tver, A.N. Kondrat’ev Publ., 2017. 310 p. (in Russian).

13. Ivanov D.A., Karaseva O.V., Rublyuk M.V. Study of the dynamics of grass productivity based on long-term monitoring data. Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka = Agricultural Science Euro-North-East, 2021, no. 22 (1), pp. 76-84 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2021.22.1.76-84

14. Ivanov D.A. Karaseva O.V., Rublyuk M.V. Results of long-term monitoring perennial grasses productiveness within agrolandscape. Vestnik rossiiskoi sel’skokhozyaistvennoi nauki = Vestnik of the Russian Agricultural Science, 2019, no. 5, pp. 8-11 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.30850/vrsn/2019/5/8-11

15. Ivanov D.A., Rublyuk M.V., Karaseva O.V. Monitoring of the influence of environmental factors on the yield of herbage. Kormoproizvodstvo = Fodder Production, 2019, no. 8, pp. 10-14 (in Russian).

16. Rabotnov T.A. Meadow studies. 2nd ed. Moscow, Publishing house of Moscow State University, 1984. 320 p. (in Russian).

17. Maevskii P.F. Flora of the middle zone of the European part of Russia. 10th ed. Moscow, KMK Scientific Publishing Association, 2006. 600 p. (in Russian).

18. Larin I.V. On the method of studying the biological and economic productivity of grassy hayfields and pastures. Botany (research). Minsk, 1968, iss. 10, pp. 15-24 (in Russian).

19. Thompson P.L., Gonzalez A. Ecosystem multifunctionality in metacommunities. Ecology, 2016, vol. 97, no. 10, pp. 2867-2879. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1502

20. Xu M., Zhang S., Wen J., Yang X. Multiscale spatial patterns of species diversity and biomass together with their correlations along geographical gradients in subalpine meadows. PLoS ONE, 2019, vol. 14, no. 2, p. e0211560. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211560

21. Gonzalez A., Germain R.M., Srivastava D.S., Filotas E., Dee L.E., Gravel D., Thompson P.L., Isbell F., Wang S., Kéfi S., Montoya J., Zelnik Y.R., Loreau M. Scaling-up biodiversity-ecosystem functioning research. Ecology Letters, 2020, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 757-776. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13456

22. Thomas R.J., Akhtar-Schuster M., Stringer L.C., Marques M.J., Escadafal R., Abraham E., Enne G. Fertile ground? Options for a science-policy platform for land. Environmental Science and Policy, 2012, vol. 16, pp. 122-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.11.002

23. Egeru A., Wasonga O., Kyagulanyi J., Majaliwa G., MacOpiyo L., Mburu J. Spatio-temporal dynamics of forage and land cover changes in Karamoja sub-region, Uganda. Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice, 2014, vol. 4, no. 1, art. 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-7136-4-6

24. Polynov B.B. Selected works. Moscow, Publishing house of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1956. 751 p. (in Russian).

25. Heil K., Heinemann P., Schmidhalter U. Modeling the effects of soil variability, topography, and management on the yield of barley. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2018, vol. 6, art. 146. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00146

26. Jiang P., Thelen K.D. Effect of soil and topographic properties on crop yield in a north-central corn-soybean cropping system. Agronomy Journal, 2004, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 252-258. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2004.0252

27. Tikhodeeva M.Yu., Lebedeva V.Kh. Practical geobotany: analysis of the composition of plant communities. St. Petersburg, Publishing House of St. Petersburg University, 2015. 165 p. (in Russian).

28. Ponyatovskaya V.M. Consideration of species abundance and distribution patterns in natural plant communities. Field geobotany. Vol. 3. Moscow, Leningrad, 1964, pp. 209-299 (in Russian).

29. Ivanov D.A., Korneeva E.M., Salikhov R.A., Petrova L.I., Pugacheva L.P., Rublyuk M.V. Creating a new generation of landscape landfill. Zemledelie, 1999, no. 6, pp. 15-16 (in Russian).

30. Plokhinskii N.A. Biometrics. 2nd ed. Moscow, Publishing House of Moscow University, 1970. 367 p. (in Russian).