Substantiation of the basic constructive-and-technological parameters of technology for preparing haylage of the cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) using gas preservative
https://doi.org/10.29235/1817-7204-2021-59-2-205-214
Abstract
The most important task for the further development of animal breeding is increase of production of feed, increase of its quality and reduction of production costs. Important thing in these conditions is the parallel development of two areas - creation of highly productive agrocenoses and development of technologies capable of saving the obtained feed mass for future use during winter period. A valuable component in grass mixtures when creating highly productive hayfields in the North-West region is the cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.), which in the North conditions forms rather high yield of feed mass, as soon as it responds to fertilizer application properly. On the basis of the Institute of Agrobiotechnology Federal Research Center Komi Scientific Center Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Russia, Komi Republic, Syktyvkar), a device has been developed for treating haylage by carbon dioxide. To determine the efficiency of this technique when harvesting haylage of cocksfoot, two series of experiments were carried out - laboratory and field. In the course of the laboratory experiment, we conducted an experiment according to the Box-Behnken plan of the second order for four factors with three levels of variation. The optimal parameters of the device were determined as a result: density of raw materials; volume of raw material processed by one spray nozzle; gas preservative consumption and its dose. In the field experiment, haylage was processed in rolls according to certain optimal parameters. The feed obtained was compared in terms of quality with haylage prepared of the same raw material in compliance with standard technology, but with no preservatives. As a result of the studies, it has been determined that carbon dioxide is most effective when harvesting the cocksfoot as raw material for haylage, with the following parameters: density of pressing the hay mass - 290-330 kg/m3 ; moisture content of raw materials - 53-55 %; dose of carbon dioxide introduced into the haylage - (0.40-0.50)∙10-3 m3 /kg; carbon dioxide consumption through a gas supply reducer 0.500.60 m3 /h. This provides an increase in feed units in one kilogram of feed by 0.3, exchange energy - by 0.4 MJ, digestible protein - by 1 g.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. G. TulinovRussian Federation
Aleksei G. Tulinov, Ph.D. (Agricultural)
27 Rucheinaya Str., Syktyvkar 167023, Komi Republic
A. Yu. Lobanov
Russian Federation
Aleksander Yu. Lobanov
27 Rucheinaya Str., Syktyvkar 167023, Komi Republic
References
1. Khorkhin S.N. Mikrobiologicheskie osnovy konservirovaniya zelenykh kormov: uchebnoe posobie [The microbiological basics of conserving green feed: a tutorial]. St. Petersburg, Prospekt Nauki, 2017, 192 p. (in Russian).
2. Struzhkina T.M. Selektsionnaya tsennost’ zarubezhnykh obraztsov ezhi sbornoi [Selective significance of the foreign samples of Dactylis glomerata L.]. Kormoproizvodstvo = Fodder Production, 2009, no. 6, pp. 22-25. (in Russian).
3. Naumova T. V., Emel’yanov A.N. Rezul’taty otsenki kollektsionnykh obraztsov ezhi sbornoi v usloviyakh Primorskogo kraya [The results of evaluating the collection accessions of Dactylis glomerata L. under the conditions of the Primorskiy Krai]. Vestnik Altaiskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Bulletin of Altai State Agrarian University, 2015, no. 8(130), pp. 22-27. (in Russian).
4. Chuvilina V.A. Preimushchestva khozyaistvenno poleznykh priznakov selektsionnogo nomera ezhi sbornoi SN-1/2 v predvaritel’nom sortoispytanii [Preliminary trial of cocksfoot genotype sn-1/2 as a carrier of economically important traits]. Kormoproizvodstvo = Fodder Production, 2018, no. 11, pp. 38-41. (in Russian).
5. Triandafilov A.F. Sposoby i tekhnicheskie sredstva povysheniya effektivnosti obrabotki sena khimicheskimi konservantami. Dis. kand. tekh. nauk [Methods and technical means of increasing the efficiency of hay treatment with chemical preservatives. Cand. tech. sci. diss.]. Leningrad-Pushkin, 1986. 156 p. (in Russian).
6. Lobanov A. Yu., Triandafilov A.F. Rezhimy i parametry tekhnologii obrabotki senazha uglekislym gazom v usloviyakh Respubliki Komi [Regimes and parameters of technology of silage processing with carbon dioxide in the Komi Republic]. Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka = Agricultural Science Euro-North-East, 2016, no. 4(53), pp. 75-80. (in Russian).
7. Zvereva G. K., Bogolyubova E.V. Ispol’zovanie ezhi sbornoi pri uluchshenii estestvennykh degradirovannykh pastbishch lesostepi [Using Dactylis glomerata L. to improve the natural degraded pastures of the forest-steppe]. Kormoproizvodstvo = Fodder Production, 2000, no. 4, pp. 15-16. (in Russian).
8. Tulinov A. G., Kosolapova T.V. Sravnitel’naya otsenka otechestvennykh i zarubezhnykh obraztsov ezhi sbornoi v usloviyakh severnogo regiona [Comparative assessment of national and foreign samples of cocksfoot grass in the Northern region]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University), 2019, no. 3(52), pp. 67-73. doi: 10.31677/2072-6724-2019-52-3-67-73 (in Russian).
9. Urazova L. D., Lozhkina O.V. Selektsiya ezhi sbornoi v usloviyakh taezhnoi zony Tomskoi oblasti [Selection of the Dactylis glomerata L. in the taiga zone of the Tomsk region]. Nauchnaya zhizn’ = Scientific Life, 2012, no. 3, pp. 18-24. (in Russian).
10. Urazova L. D., Litvinchuk O.V. Zimostoikost’ ezhi sbornoi v ekstremal’nykh usloviyakh taezhnoi zony [Winter hardiness of the cocksfoot in the extreme conditions of the taiga zone]. Nauchnaya zhizn’ = Scientific Life, 2018, no. 10, pp. 64-76. (in Russian).
11. Tulinov A. G., Kosolapova T.V. Produktivnost’ obraztsov ezhi sbornoi (Dactylis glomerata L.) v usloviyakh Severa [Productivity of cocksfoot samples (Dactylis glomerata L.) in the North]. Kormoproizvodstvo = Fodder Production, 2018, no. 11, pp. 38-41. (in Russian).
12. Demina M. I., Solov’ev A.V. Urozhainost’ ovsyanitsy trostnikovoi i ezhi sbornoi na uvlazhnennykh mestakh pri raznom urovne azotnogo pitaniya [The yield of tall fescue and cocksfoot in moist places at different levels of nitrogen nutrition]. Agrarnaya Rossiya = Agrarian Russia, 2012, no. 3, pp. 2-4. doi: 10.30906/1999-5636-2012-3-2-4. (in Russian).
13. Lazarev N. N., Kostikova T. V., Belenkov A.I. Vliyanie azotnykh udobrenii na urozhainost’ pastbishchnykh travosmesei na osnove raigrasa pastbishchnogo, ezhi sbornoi i klevera polzuchego [Effect of nitrogen fertilizers on productivity of pasture grass mixtures composed of perennial ryegrass, cocksfoot, and white clover]. Plodorodie = «Plodorodie», 2016, no. 3(90), pp. 24-27. (in Russian).
14. Wiśniewska-Kadżajan B., Malinowska E., Misiak M. Concentrations of K, Mg and Na and their ionic relations in Dactylis glomerata L. Biomass grown in soil with mushroom substrate and mineral fertilizers. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 2017, no.
15. (3), pp. 1269-1278. doi: 10.15666/aeer/1503_12691278. 15. Tilvikienė V., Šlepetienė A., Kadžiulienė Ž. Effects of 5 years of digestate application on biomass production and quality of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.). Grass and Forage Science, 2018, no. 73(1), pp. 206-217. doi: 10.1111/gfs.12306.
16. Kostenko S. I., Kuleshov G. F., Klochkova V. S., Kostenko N. Yu. Ezha sbornaya (Dactylis glomerata L.) [Cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.)]. Osnovnye vidy i sorta kormovykh kul’tur [The main types and varieties of feed crops]. Moscow, 2015, pp. 187-190. (in Russian).
17. Zaripova L. P., Gibadullina F. S., Shakirov Sh. K., Tagirov M. Sh., Nurtdinov M. G., Khazipov N. N., Bykova M. Yu., Gabdrakhmanov I. Kh., Shurkhno R. A., Lukmanov A.A. Korma Respubliki Tatarstan: sostav, pitatel’nost’ i ispol’zovanie: Spravochnik [Feed of the Republic of Tatarstan: composition, nutrition and use: Reference]. Kazan, Foliant, 2010, 272 p. (in Russian).
18. Kosolapov V. M., Trofimov I.A. Spravochnik po kormoproizvodstvu [Directory of feed production]. Moscow, Rossel’khozakademiya, 2014, 717 p. (in Russian).
19. Shmorgunov G. T., Kokovkina S. V., Tsvetkova Z. K., Oblizov A. V., Yudin A. A., Chebotarev N. T., Bulatova N. V., Belyaeva R. A., Triandafilov A. F., Blokh E. A., Makarovskii P. A., Shekhonin Yu. M., Khomchenko A. A., Kolegov N. V., Ermolina V. I., Kosolapova T. V., Karakchieva E. F., Tulinov A. G., Konkin P. I., Pelevina N. I., Shestopalova N. S., Babela A. V., Semenchin S. I., Romanov G. G., Ortyakova T. V., Lobanov A. Yu., Regorchuk N. V., Shershunova O. N., Popov D. A. Sistema zemledeliya Respubliki Komi [The farming system of the Komi Republic]. Syktyvkar, GOU VO KRAGSiU, 2017, 225 p. (in Russian).
20. Triandafilov A. F., Lobanov A. Y., Tulinov A. G., Shlyk M.Y. Using carbon dioxide for fodder conservation. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Research, 2017, no. 9(5), pp. 728-731.
21. Bretshnaider S. Svoistva gazov i zhidkostei [Properties of gases and liquids]. Moscow, Khimiya, 1966, 536 p. (in Russian).
22. Mel’nikov S. V., Aleshkin V. R., Roshchin P.M. Planirovanie eksperimenta v issledovaniyakh sel’skokhozyaistvennykh protsessov [Planning an experiment in research of agricultural processes]. Leningrad, Kolos, 1980, 168 p. (in Russian).
23. Moskalenko S.P. Teoreticheskoe i prakticheskoe obosnovanie ispol’zovaniya senazha v myagkoi upakovke v ratsionakh krupnogo rogatogo skota. Dis. dokt. sel’khoz. nauk [Theoretical and practical rationale for the use of haylage in soft packaging in cattle diets. Dr. agric. sci. diss.]. Saransk, 2006. 323 p. (in Russian).
24. Tulinov A. G., Kosolapova T. V., Mikhailova E.A. Rezul’taty otsenki kollektsionnykh obraztsov Dactylis glomerata L. v usloviyakh Respubliki Komi [Results of the evaluation of collection samples of Dactylis glomerata L. under conditions of the Komi Republic]. Zemledelie = «Zemledelije», 2019, no. 3, pp. 41-43. doi: 10.24411/0044-3913-2019-10311. (in Russian).
25. Taranov N.G. Khimicheskoe konservirovanie kormov [Chemical conservation of feed]. Moscow, Kolos, 143 p. (in Russian). 214 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, agrarian series, 2021, vol. 5