Multifunctional agriculture and its effect on rural territories development
https://doi.org/10.29235/1817-7204-2019-57-3-277-285
Abstract
The paper deals with the main conceptual approaches to the definition of agriculture multifunctionality, indicates positive changes towards multifunctionality of rural territories in Ukraine and substantiates the main restraining factors such as low level of innovation activity of economic entities operating in this sphere, related sectors of economy, moral ageing of social and communal infrastructure of the village, lack of relations with universities which are the main generators of knowledge. The paper proposes to establish the Regional Coordination Centers for Rural Development in the structure of the Agro-industrial Development Departments. The main function of the centers should be obtaining multifunctional agriculture due to interaction of enterprises and the state shifting the emphasis from production to rural development. It is noted that the establishment of such centers in the conditions of decentralization will allow ensuring interaction of enterprises, state and population and implementing properly multifunctionality of agriculture. It is proved that forming the conceptual foundations of rural development, it should be borne in mind that sustainable multifunctional development should be based on effective rural economy, extended reproduction of human capital and productive employment of rural population, on improvement of people’s quality of life, rational use of natural resources and their reproduction.
About the Authors
A. S. DanylenkoUkraine
Danylenko Anatoly S. - Academician of NAAS of Ukraine, D. Sc. (Economics), Professor.
pl. 8/1 Soborna, Bila Tserkva, Kyivska oblast, 09117.
T. V. Sokolska
Ukraine
Sokolska Tatyana V. - D. Sc. (Economics), Associate Professor.
pl. 8/1 Soborna, Bila Tserkva, Kyivska oblast, 09117.
P. I. Yukhymenko
Ukraine
Yukhymenko Petr I. - D. Sc. (Economics), Professor.
pl. 8/1 Soborna, Bila Tserkva, Kyivska oblast, 09117.
V. I. Lobunets
Ukraine
Lobunets Viktoriya I. - Ph.D. (Economics), Associate Professor.
pl. 8/1 Soborna, Bila Tserkva, Kyivska oblast, 09117.
References
1. Towards multifunctional agriculture for social, environmental and economic sustainability. Available at: https://www.globalagriculture.org/fileadmin/files/weltagrarbericht/IAASTDBerichte/IssuesBriefMultifunctionality.pdf (accessed 08.02.2019).
2. Borodina O. M, Prokopa I. V. (eds.). Theory, policy and practice of rural development. Kyiv, The Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the NASU, 2010. 376 p. (in Ukrainian).
3. Agriculture at a crossroads: global summary for decision makers. Washington, Island Press, 2009. Available at: https://www.weltagrarbericht.de/fileadmin/files/weltagrarbericht/IAASTDBerichte/GlobalSDM.pdf (accessed 08.02.2019).
4. Casini L., Contini C., Romano C. Paths to developing multifunctional agriculture: insights for rural development policies. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 2012, vol. 9, no. 3/4, pp. 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJARGE.2012.050347
5. Huylenbroeck G. van, Vandermeulen V., Mettepenningen E., Verspecht A. Multifunctionality of agriculture: a review of definitions, evidence and instruments. Living Reviews in Landscape Research, 2007, vol. 1, art. 3. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrlr-2007-3
6. Dreer J., Schiller S., Canalicchio M., Klawitter I. Multifunctionality – the state of the art. AgriMultifunctionality II. 2013. 18 р.
7. FAO and the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries of the Netherlands – Sustaining the Multiple Functions of Agricultural Biodiversity:Background Paper 1: Agricultural Biodiversity. Paper Prepared for the 1999 FAO/NL Conference on the Multifunctional Character of Agriculture and Land. 12–17 September, Maastricht, Netherlands.
8. ODIN – Ministry of Agriculture (LD) Norway – Non-Trade Concerns in a Multifunctional Agriculture – Implications for Agricultural Policy and the Multilateral Trading System, Website, 1999, 12 p.
9. OECD – Multifunctionality: a framework of policy analysis, OECD, AGR/CA (98)9, 18 November 1998, 24 p.
10. Potter C., Burney J. Agricultural multifunctionality in the WTO: legitimate non-trade concern or disguised protectionism? Journal of Rural Studies, 2002, vol. 18, iss. 1, pp. 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0743-0167(01)00031-6
11. FAO and the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries of the Netherlands. The Multifunctional Character of Agriculture and Land: The Energy Function. Background Paper 2: Bioenergy. Paper Prepared for the 1999 FAO/ NL Conference on the Multifunctional Character of Agriculture and Land. 12-17 September, Maastricht, Netherlands.
12. Potter C., Tilzey M. Agricultural mutfunctional in the WTO: the implications for the design of EU rural policy. London : EPMG, Imperial College London, Working Paper, 2002.
13. Garzon I. Multifunctionality of Agriculture in the European Union: is there substance behind the discourse’s smoke? Berkeley, 2005. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/80b3v0z6 (accessed 01.04.2019).
14. Marsden T., Sonnino R. Rural development and the regional state: Denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies, 2008, vol. 24, iss. 4, pp. 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.04.001
15. Wilson G. A. Multifunctional agriculture: a transition theory perspective. Wallingford, CABI, 2007. 374 p. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845932565.0000
16. Thompson K. Van Huylenbroeck. G. and Durand G. (eds.) (2003) Multifunctional agriculture: a new paradigm for European agriculture and rural development. The Welfare Economics of Public Polic. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2004, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 653–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2004.tb00118.x
17. Vatn A. Multifunctional agriculture: some consequences for international trade regimes. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2002, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurrag/29.3.309
18. Caron P., Reig E., Roep D., Hediger W., Le Cotty T., Barthélemy D., Hadyńska A., Hadyński J., Oostindie H. A., Sabourin E. Multifunctionality: refocusing a spreading, loose and fashionable concept for looking at sustainability? International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 2008, vol. 7, no. 4/5, pp. 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijarge.2008.020078
19. Delgado M., Ramos E., Gallardo R., Ramos F. Multifunctionality and rural development: a necessary convergence. Multifunctional agriculture: a new paradigm for European agriculture and rural development. Aldershot, 2003, pp. 19–36.
20. Bolunan et al. and country papers submitted to the AIE process of the WTO. AIE 73 (the European Union), AIE 60 (Japan), AIE 64 (the United States), AIE 67 (Switzerland), AIE 68 (Norway). 1999.
21. Lankoski J. (ed.). Multifunctional character of agriculture. Helsinki, Agricultural Economics Research Institute, 2000. 81 р.
22. Ploeg J. D. van der, Roep D. Multifunctionality and rural development: the actual situation in Europe. Multifunctional agriculture: a new paradigm for European agriculture and rural development. Aldershot, 2003, pp. 37–53.
23. Potter C. Multifunctionality as an agricultural and rural policy concept. Sustaining agriculture and the rural economy: governance, policy and multifunctionality. Cheltenham, 2004, pp. 15–35.
24. Renting H., Oostindie H., Laurent C., Brunori G., Barjolle D., Moxnes Jervell A., Granberg L., Heinonen M. Multifunctionality of agricultural activities, changing rural identities and new institutional arrangements. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 2008, vol. 7, no. 4/5, pp. 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijarge.2008.020083
25. Danilenko A. S. (ed.). Institutionalization of public management and administration in the context of innovative development of rural areas: theory and practice. Kyiv, Center for Educational Literature, 2018. 320 p. (in Ukrainian).
26. Darmostuk D. G. Trends of green tourism development in Ukraine. Teorіya ta praktika derzhavnogo upravlіnnya = Theory and Practice of Public Administration, 2017, no. 2 (57), pp. 138–143 (in Ukrainian).
27. Tranchenko L. V. Rural tourism as a promising direction of rural employment. Ekonomіchnii forum = Economic Forum, 2014, no. 3, pp. 104–110 (in Ukrainian).
28. Kudla N. E. The role of tourism in socio-economic development of rural areas. Sotsіal’no-ekonomіchnі problemi suchasnogo perіodu Ukraїni: zbіrnik naukovikh prats’ = Socio-economic problems of the modern period of Ukraine: collection of scientific works. Lviv, 2013, iss. 6 (104), pp. 292–298 (in Ukrainian).
29. Pro stymuliuvannia rozvytku rehioniv : Zakon vid 8 veresnia 2005 roku № 2850-IV [On Stimulation of the Development of Regions: Law №. 2850-IV of 8 September 2005] Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR), 2005, № 51, st.548 – Information from the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (VVR), 2005, № 51, p.548. zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/anot/2850-15. Retrieved from: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/anot/2850-15. (Accessed 10 March 2019).
30. Kropivko M. F. Cluster approach to rural development management. Ekonomіka APK = The Economy of Agro-Industrial Complex, 2008, no. 5, pp. 55–58 (in Ukrainian).




























