Многофункциональное сельское хозяйство и его влияние на развитие сельских территорий

В статье рассматриваются основные концептуальные подходы к определению многофункциональности сельского хозяйства, констатированы положительные сдвиги в направлении многофункциональности сельских территорий в Украине и обоснованы основные сдерживающие факторы, среди которых: низкий уровень инновационной активности субъектов хозяйствования, работающих в этой сфере и смежных с ней секторах экономики; моральное старение социальной и коммунальной инфраструктуры сельской местности; отсутствие связи с университетами – основными генераторами знаний. Предложено создание в структуре департаментов агропромышленного развития региональных координационных центров развития села, основной функцией которых должно стать достижение многофункциональности сельского хозяйства путем взаимодействия предприятий и государства со смещением акцента от производственной функции к сельскому развитию. Отмечено, что в условиях децентрализации создание таких центров позволит обеспечить взаимодействие предприятий, государства и населения и в должной мере реализовать многофункциональность сельского хозяйства. Доказано, что при формировании концептуальных основ развития сельских территорий необходимо иметь в виду, что устойчивое многофункциональное их развитие должно быть основано на эффективной сельской экономике, расширенном воспроизводстве человеческого капитала и продуктивной занятости сельского населения, повышении уровня и качества его жизни, рациональном использовании и воспроизводстве природных ресурсов.

1. Towards multifunctional agriculture for social, environmental and economic sustainability. Available at: https://www.globalagriculture.org/fileadmin/files/weltagrarbericht/IAASTDBerichte/IssuesBriefMultifunctionality.pdf (accessed 08.02.2019).

2. Borodina O. M, Prokopa I. V. (eds.). Theory, policy and practice of rural development. Kyiv, The Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the NASU, 2010. 376 p. (in Ukrainian).

3. Agriculture at a crossroads: global summary for decision makers. Washington, Island Press, 2009. Available at: https://www.weltagrarbericht.de/fileadmin/files/weltagrarbericht/IAASTDBerichte/GlobalSDM.pdf (accessed 08.02.2019).

4. Casini L., Contini C., Romano C. Paths to developing multifunctional agriculture: insights for rural development policies. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 2012, vol. 9, no. 3/4, pp. 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJARGE.2012.050347

5. Huylenbroeck G. van, Vandermeulen V., Mettepenningen E., Verspecht A. Multifunctionality of agriculture: a review of definitions, evidence and instruments. Living Reviews in Landscape Research, 2007, vol. 1, art. 3. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrlr-2007-3

6. Dreer J., Schiller S., Canalicchio M., Klawitter I. Multifunctionality – the state of the art. AgriMultifunctionality II. 2013. 18 р.

7. FAO and the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries of the Netherlands – Sustaining the Multiple Functions of Agricultural Biodiversity:Background Paper 1: Agricultural Biodiversity. Paper Prepared for the 1999 FAO/NL Conference on the Multifunctional Character of Agriculture and Land. 12–17 September, Maastricht, Netherlands.

8. ODIN – Ministry of Agriculture (LD) Norway – Non-Trade Concerns in a Multifunctional Agriculture – Implications for Agricultural Policy and the Multilateral Trading System, Website, 1999, 12 p.

9. OECD – Multifunctionality: a framework of policy analysis, OECD, AGR/CA (98)9, 18 November 1998, 24 p.

10. Potter C., Burney J. Agricultural multifunctionality in the WTO: legitimate non-trade concern or disguised protectionism? Journal of Rural Studies, 2002, vol. 18, iss. 1, pp. 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0743-0167(01)00031-6

11. FAO and the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries of the Netherlands. The Multifunctional Character of Agriculture and Land: The Energy Function. Background Paper 2: Bioenergy. Paper Prepared for the 1999 FAO/ NL Conference on the Multifunctional Character of Agriculture and Land. 12-17 September, Maastricht, Netherlands.

12. Potter C., Tilzey M. Agricultural mutfunctional in the WTO: the implications for the design of EU rural policy. London : EPMG, Imperial College London, Working Paper, 2002.

13. Garzon I. Multifunctionality of Agriculture in the European Union: is there substance behind the discourse’s smoke? Berkeley, 2005. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/80b3v0z6 (accessed 01.04.2019).

14. Marsden T., Sonnino R. Rural development and the regional state: Denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies, 2008, vol. 24, iss. 4, pp. 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.04.001

15. Wilson G. A. Multifunctional agriculture: a transition theory perspective. Wallingford, CABI, 2007. 374 p. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845932565.0000

16. Thompson K. Van Huylenbroeck. G. and Durand G. (eds.) (2003) Multifunctional agriculture: a new paradigm for European agriculture and rural development. The Welfare Economics of Public Polic. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2004, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 653–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2004.tb00118.x

17. Vatn A. Multifunctional agriculture: some consequences for international trade regimes. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2002, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurrag/29.3.309

18. Caron P., Reig E., Roep D., Hediger W., Le Cotty T., Barthélemy D., Hadyńska A., Hadyński J., Oostindie H. A., Sabourin E. Multifunctionality: refocusing a spreading, loose and fashionable concept for looking at sustainability? International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 2008, vol. 7, no. 4/5, pp. 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijarge.2008.020078

19. Delgado M., Ramos E., Gallardo R., Ramos F. Multifunctionality and rural development: a necessary convergence. Multifunctional agriculture: a new paradigm for European agriculture and rural development. Aldershot, 2003, pp. 19–36.

20. Bolunan et al. and country papers submitted to the AIE process of the WTO. AIE 73 (the European Union), AIE 60 (Japan), AIE 64 (the United States), AIE 67 (Switzerland), AIE 68 (Norway). 1999.

21. Lankoski J. (ed.). Multifunctional character of agriculture. Helsinki, Agricultural Economics Research Institute, 2000. 81 р.

22. Ploeg J. D. van der, Roep D. Multifunctionality and rural development: the actual situation in Europe. Multifunctional agriculture: a new paradigm for European agriculture and rural development. Aldershot, 2003, pp. 37–53.

23. Potter C. Multifunctionality as an agricultural and rural policy concept. Sustaining agriculture and the rural economy: governance, policy and multifunctionality. Cheltenham, 2004, pp. 15–35.

24. Renting H., Oostindie H., Laurent C., Brunori G., Barjolle D., Moxnes Jervell A., Granberg L., Heinonen M. Multifunctionality of agricultural activities, changing rural identities and new institutional arrangements. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 2008, vol. 7, no. 4/5, pp. 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijarge.2008.020083

25. Danilenko A. S. (ed.). Institutionalization of public management and administration in the context of innovative development of rural areas: theory and practice. Kyiv, Center for Educational Literature, 2018. 320 p. (in Ukrainian).

26. Darmostuk D. G. Trends of green tourism development in Ukraine. Teorіya ta praktika derzhavnogo upravlіnnya = Theory and Practice of Public Administration, 2017, no. 2 (57), pp. 138–143 (in Ukrainian).

27. Tranchenko L. V. Rural tourism as a promising direction of rural employment. Ekonomіchnii forum = Economic Forum, 2014, no. 3, pp. 104–110 (in Ukrainian).

28. Kudla N. E. The role of tourism in socio-economic development of rural areas. Sotsіal’no-ekonomіchnі problemi suchasnogo perіodu Ukraїni: zbіrnik naukovikh prats’ = Socio-economic problems of the modern period of Ukraine: collection of scientific works. Lviv, 2013, iss. 6 (104), pp. 292–298 (in Ukrainian).

29. Pro stymuliuvannia rozvytku rehioniv : Zakon vid 8 veresnia 2005 roku № 2850-IV [On Stimulation of the Development of Regions: Law №. 2850-IV of 8 September 2005] Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR), 2005, № 51, st.548 – Information from the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (VVR), 2005, № 51, p.548. zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/anot/2850-15. Retrieved from: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/anot/2850-15. (Accessed 10 March 2019).

30. Kropivko M. F. Cluster approach to rural development management. Ekonomіka APK = The Economy of Agro-Industrial Complex, 2008, no. 5, pp. 55–58 (in Ukrainian).